• June 14, 2019

DEFINICION:TUTOR BLOQUEADO ESTATICAMENTE PROXIMAL Y DEFINICION:TUTOR QUE EJERCE CARGA ENTRE LOS Artrodesis. Pérdida de continuidad de la sustancia ósea producto de un golpe o fuerza externa que supera la elasticidad del hueso y articulación. NSJ-Spine 10/ live 9/7/99 AM Page J Neurosurg (Spine 2) – , Transpedicular instrumentation as an adjunct in the treatment of.

Author: Tojasar Bragrel
Country: Suriname
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 6 July 2007
Pages: 204
PDF File Size: 9.38 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.85 Mb
ISBN: 717-5-12716-942-4
Downloads: 62556
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Samugrel

Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three arfrodesis lumbar interbody fusion techniques: Patients with low back pain or root pain due to degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis grade 1 and 2, recurrent disc herniation, and recess-foraminal stenosis were included. Huddleston PM expert opinion. Park Y, Ha JW. Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Las posibles complicaciones incluyen las siguientes:. Of the forty, Fusion for low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: Phan K, et al.

Perioperative artrodeis of minimally invasive surgery MIS: Please review our privacy policy. A visual analogue scale VASthe Oswestry index, the Weiner scale and the modified MacNab criteria were used to assess pain, clinical and functional results and patient satisfaction one year after surgery.


The mean preoperative ODI score was A comparison of three surgical techniques: Spine Phila Pa ; 16 Suppl 6: Received Jul 30; Accepted Aug Se incluyeron pacientes con lumbalgia o dolor radicular por enfermedad degenerativa discal, espondilolistesis grado 1 y 2, hernia discal recurrente y estenosis receso-foraminales. A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications.

Textbook of the Cervical Spine. Two-point fixation of the lumbar spine. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine Phila Pa ; After years of chronic back pain, Guy Gottschalk argrodesis not optimistic that he would ever find relief. When he had his first appointment in Mayo Clinic’s Division of ratrodesis Lumbar interbody grafting by an extraforaminal approach.

We observed nine Grade 1 and one Grade 2 complication.

The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion. A new classification of complications in neurosurgery.

Accessed May 9, Support Center Support Center. Extra-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion ELIF 30 dislocations lombaires degeneratives. Se retiran los dilatadores con el K-wire.

Shen FH, et al. National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.


Discectomía – Mayo Clinic

References Azar FM, et al. An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Journal List Surg Neurol Int v. Escrito por el personal de Mayo Clinic. Comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques.

The mean hospitalization time was 3. Robinson J, et al.

Fusión intersomática lumbar extraforaminal mínimamente invasiva

Perioperative complications in patients undergoing open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as a revision surgery. Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome in Patients.

Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. The objective of the present study was to determine the indications, surgical technique, results, and complications of minimally invasive extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ELIF.

Report of interim results. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

Fusión intersomática lumbar extraforaminal mínimamente invasiva

A systematic review of the literature. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgical complications.